Alibaba, part owned by Yahoo, has been working on an IPO in Hong Kong for many months but the company has proposed a partnership structure of 28 founders and executives who will run the business when it is public.
That approach bumped up against corporate governance rules of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which aim to give investors control over companies based on how many shares they own and limit so-called dual share-class structures.
Talks between Alibaba and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange have broken off and the company has hired attorneys to help it pursue an IPO in the U.S., the person said, on condition of anonymity. The person did not want to be identified because Alibaba's plans are not public.
Alibaba's IPO may rival Facebook's in size and importance, valuing the Chinese e-commerce company at more than $100 billion. An IPO in the U.S. would be an important win for U.S. exchanges, bankers and lawyers involved in the process — although for most large investors where the company is listed makes little difference.
Alibaba's goal is to bring its partnership approach to corporate governance to the U.S., hoping to raise money from outside investors while giving founders and executives enough control to run the business for the long-term.
"It's all about accountability and the ability of public stockholders to have a say versus the founders not wanting to cede control," said Tom Murphy, a securities and capital markets partner at law firm McDermott, Will & Emery. "How much is about long-term projects as opposed to just wanting to know you can stay in charge probably depends on who you ask."
Facebook and Google, two of the most successful technology companies in the U.S., have dual, or multiple share-class structures that give founders and management more voting power than other shareholders.
Alibaba is not planning to use a dual share-class structure, however in U.S. capital markets the company could provide similar control for founders and executives through its partnership model, according to Murphy.
"In the U.S. they can also have the 28 people agree to vote their stock together which also makes it even easier for that group to maintain control at a lower level of stock ownership," Murphy explained.
Charles Li, head of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, weighed in on the debate in a blog Wednesday.
"We need to look objectively at the issues and not be swayed by emotional arguments or be distracted by specific circumstances of any given company or issue," Li wrote. "In the end, we should take responsibility for doing what is right and best for Hong Kong, not just what is safe and easy."
While the Hong Kong Stock Exchange would benefit financially from an Alibaba listing in Hong Kong, Li said the "public interest" is a more important consideration.
No comments:
Post a Comment